What if AI could take over your parenting duties for one week?

Recently, an enterprising New York Times journalist experimented with the concept of whether AI could be employed as a family agent. This experiment raises important questions about the potential utility and potential limitations of the role of AI in our family lives.

Greg Wallig

11/6/20242 min read

What if AI could take over your parenting duties for one week?

As parents, we're constantly juggling work, family, and a seemingly endless to-do list. Wouldn't it be nice to press pause, even for a moment? Imagine a world where artificial intelligence could step in, taking the reins of our parenting duties.

Recently, an enterprising New York Times journalist, Kashmir Hill, experimented with this very concept. For a week, she handed over her decision-making power to an AI chatbot. The results were fascinating, but also revealed the importance of humans in parenting. Generative AI made decent decisions quickly, and surfaced quality ideas faster, but lacked an expected ‘wow’ factor: the judgment and heart so important to parenting.

You can read the NYT article in about 5-7 minutes, or listen to a 20 minute podcast version. Both are entertaining and informative in their own way.

Generative A.I. Made All My Decisions for a Week. Here's What Happened. - The New York Times

This experiment raises important questions about the role of AI in our lives. While it's clear that AI has the potential to automate many tasks, it's important to remember that it's not a magic solution. Human judgment, empathy, and creativity are still essential.

Some key take-aways and thoughts to consider:

  • AI Brainstorming: The experiment showed that AI could provide informed suggestions based on data and patterns. For parents, this may include drafting schedules, generating ideas for family vacations or even thoughts for fun songs or game nights. The author had success including children in this creative process, with supervision.

  • Convenience vs. Autonomy: While AI decision-making offered convenience, the writer also grappled with a loss of autonomy. Be aware you may be receiving commercially-sponsored advice from your AI agent.

  • Emotional Impact: The writer highlighted the emotional toll of relying on AI. "There were moments of frustration and detachment, as I struggled to connect with the AI's choices on a personal level." Say “no thank you” to AI writing your “thank you’s” if you want them to have any real emotional impact. This is an important message for children to learn as well.

  • Ethical Considerations: The author noted the potential for algorithmic normalization to the point of blandness, and also the potential for confirmation bias. At its best, this tendency turns every color beige, at its worst it marginalizes aspects of society, robbing children of the richness and exploration that is essential to learning.

  • No Judging, but also No Judgment: AI provided a “judgment free-zone,” helping to alleviate the insecurity that underlies all parenting. AI helped with inevitable questions, like "am I doing this right?" and "what else could this rash possibly be?" While helpful in "what if" situations, AI’s aspirational suggestions could also lead to unrealistic ideals that parents may never live up to, feeding pre-existing insecurity in some parents.

So, while the idea of an AI nanny may seem appealing, it's important to approach it with a healthy dose of skepticism. For now, it's best to view AI as a tool to assist us, rather than replace us. After all, there's no substitute for the love, care, and guidance that only a human parent can provide.